ASEAN-Led Multilateralism and Regional Order: The Great Power Bargain Deficit

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    Do smaller ASEAN states "punch above their weight" in regional affairs or is their multilateralism "cheap talk" and deluded ambition? An evaluation of the extent to which ASEAN-led multilateralism contributes to regional order finds less effectiveness in mediating conflicts of interest than expected. It has been effective in inclusiveness, legitimizing great power roles, and institutionalizing small state voices. Yet, its mode of multilateralism has grown less effective as regional strategic challenges have evolved. It has suffered from restricted scope and oversight domain, nondemanding and minimalist norms, and great powers in collusion with smaller states opting for "soft" balancing more than regional "rules of the game." Overlapping institutions are helpful in muting security dilemmas, but they fail to regulate great power relations through institutionalized understandings about rules of conduct and conflict management.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationInternational Relations and Asia's Southern Tier: ASEAN, Australia and India
    EditorsGilbert Rozman and Joseph Chinyong Liow
    Place of PublicationSingapore
    PublisherSpringer Singapore
    Pages45-61
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)978-981-10-3170-0
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'ASEAN-Led Multilateralism and Regional Order: The Great Power Bargain Deficit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this