Abstract
A recent evaluation of how English dictionaries have treated the etymologies of some words borrowed from Australian languages was based on the authors own etymologies. I have examined one of these, for boomerang, and show that it incorporates inaccuracies and distortions, and that the criticism of J. A. H. Murrays etymology is unfounded. I suggest how the authors methodology may have led him astray.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 179-188 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | International Journal of Lexicography |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2009 |