Australian Attitudes Towards Waivers of Consent Within the Context of Genomic Data Sharing

Lyndsay Newett, Rebekah McWhirter, Lisa Eckstein, Vanessa Warren, Dianne Nicol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This research identifies the circumstances in which Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) are trusted by Australians to approve the use of genomic data – without express consent – and considers the impact of genomic data sharing settings, and respondent attributes, on public trust. Survey results (N = 3013) show some circumstances are more conducive to public trust than others, with waivers endorsed when future research is beneficial and when privacy is protected, but receiving less support in other instances. Still, results imply attitudes are influenced by more than these specific circumstances, with different data sharing settings, and participant attributes, affecting views. Ultimately, this research raises questions and concerns in relation to the criteria HRECs use when authorising waivers of consent in Australia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-123
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Australian Attitudes Towards Waivers of Consent Within the Context of Genomic Data Sharing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this