Australian exceptionalism reconsidered

Keith Dowding*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australian exceptionalism has long been claimed in diverse fields. This essay reconsiders claims for Australian exceptionalism first discussing its nature. Exceptionalism cannot simply be uniqueness since everywhere is unique at some level of granularity, thus the level of detail at which countries or places are compared must be equivalent. One mistake is to take one country as the exception whilst lumping everywhere else together. It argues exceptionalism requires a rule systematically explaining difference. The best bet for such a rule is the Australia’s political institutions. It argues Australian exceptionalism has not been demonstrated, however, the claim is not of that nature, is a declaration made by Australians to distinguish their subject from the dominion of British commentators on Australian affairs.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)165-182
    Number of pages18
    JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
    Volume52
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Australian exceptionalism reconsidered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this