TY - JOUR
T1 - Australian general practice and pandemic influenza
T2 - Models of clinical practice in an established pandemic
AU - Phillips, Christine B.
AU - Patel, Mahomed S.
AU - Glasgow, Nicholas
AU - Pearce, Christopher
AU - Dugdale, Paul
AU - Davies, Alison
AU - Hall, Sally
AU - Kljakovic, Marjan
PY - 2007/4/2
Y1 - 2007/4/2
N2 - • To minimise the health impact of pandemic influenza, general practice will need to provide influenza-related and non-influenza primary health care, as well as contribute to the public health goal of disease control. • Through interviews and workshops with general practitioners, nurses and policy leaders between March and July 2006, and literature analysis, we identified potential models of general practice in an established pandemic, and assessed their strengths and weaknesses. • Three possible clinical models were identified: a default model of no change to service delivery; a streamed services model, where general practices reorganise themselves to take on either influenza-specific care or other clinical services; and a staff-determined mixed model, where staff move between different types of services. • No single model or set of strategies meets the needs of all general practices to deliver and sustain the essential functions of primary health care during an established pandemic. Governments, general practice and the relevant peak professional bodies should decide before a pandemic on the suite of measures needed to support the models most suitable in their regions. • Effective participation by general practice in a pandemic requires supplementary infrastructure support, changes to financial and staffing patterns, a review of legislation on medicolegal implications during an emergency, and intensive collaboration between general practices.
AB - • To minimise the health impact of pandemic influenza, general practice will need to provide influenza-related and non-influenza primary health care, as well as contribute to the public health goal of disease control. • Through interviews and workshops with general practitioners, nurses and policy leaders between March and July 2006, and literature analysis, we identified potential models of general practice in an established pandemic, and assessed their strengths and weaknesses. • Three possible clinical models were identified: a default model of no change to service delivery; a streamed services model, where general practices reorganise themselves to take on either influenza-specific care or other clinical services; and a staff-determined mixed model, where staff move between different types of services. • No single model or set of strategies meets the needs of all general practices to deliver and sustain the essential functions of primary health care during an established pandemic. Governments, general practice and the relevant peak professional bodies should decide before a pandemic on the suite of measures needed to support the models most suitable in their regions. • Effective participation by general practice in a pandemic requires supplementary infrastructure support, changes to financial and staffing patterns, a review of legislation on medicolegal implications during an emergency, and intensive collaboration between general practices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147110921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00937.x
DO - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00937.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0025-729X
VL - 186
SP - 355
EP - 358
JO - Medical Journal of Australia
JF - Medical Journal of Australia
IS - 7
ER -