Australian medical professionals, national security and administrative offshore punishment of asylum-seekers: Regulatory update including the MeDEVAC legislation

Sarah Miller, Thomas Faunce

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This article updates how Australia's national security concerns have intersected with the regulation of Australian medical practitioners in the area of mandatory, indefinite, administrative offshore detention of asylum-seekers. It outlines relevant recent decisions of the High Court, including dissenting opinions that such detention represents unconstitutional extra-judicial punishment with a primary deterrence aim. It evaluates recent amendments to the Australian Border Force Act 2015 (Cth) as well as exploring recent relevant legislation and administrative, political and judicial decisions made in both Papua New Guinea and the Republic of Nauru. It considers the Medical Evacuation legislation and the Australian Government's attempts to challenge judicial authority to transfer people off Nauru for medical treatment. The article concludes with an analysis of prospects for further Australian asylum seeker and refugee policy and legislative reform more coherent with basic principles of medical ethics and international human rights.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)742-749
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of law and medicine
Volume26
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Australian medical professionals, national security and administrative offshore punishment of asylum-seekers: Regulatory update including the MeDEVAC legislation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this