Australian Mental Health Consumer and Carer Perspectives on Ethics in Adult Mental Health Research

Alyssa R. Morse*, Owen Forbes, Bethany A. Jones, Amelia Gulliver, Michelle Banfield

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Barriers to research arise when national ethical guidelines governing the inclusion of consumers in mental health research are implemented at the local level. Equivalent guidelines for research involving carers are not available. A social science investigation of Australian mental health consumer and carer perspectives on research ethics procedures was conducted in two interlinked stages: (a) a discussion forum with consumers, carers, and lived-experience researchers and (b) in-depth interviews with consumers and carers. Data collection and analysis drew strongly on methodological features of grounded theory. Privacy, confidentiality, and stigmatizing ethics procedures were key issues for consumer and carer participants. Recommendations for research practice include the following: considering the impact of information sharing on participants’ relationships and adopting individual-focused approaches to managing research risks.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)234-242
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
    Volume14
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Australian Mental Health Consumer and Carer Perspectives on Ethics in Adult Mental Health Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this