Australian regulation of animal use in science and education: A critical appraisal

Aaron C. Timoshanko, Helen Marston*, Brett A. Lidbury

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    One of the touchstone principles in Australia's regulation of the use of animals for scientific and educational purposes is reduction, refinement and replacement (3Rs). However, the use of animals for scientific and educational purposes is increasing in Australia, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the current regulatory framework in achieving the objectives of the 3Rs. This article critically evaluates the current regulatory framework in Australia. Several strengths are identified. However, 4 recommendations to improve the regulatory environment are proposed to bring Australia in line with international best practice. Specifically, Australian regulation governing the use of animals for scientific or educational purposes could be improved through greater transparency, higher standards of competency, the development of a central regulatory authority, and greater incentives to encourage research and development into nonanimal alternatives.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)324-332
    Number of pages9
    JournalILAR Journal
    Volume57
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Australian regulation of animal use in science and education: A critical appraisal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this