TY - JOUR
T1 - Australian Socially Responsible Funds
T2 - Performance, Risk and Screening Intensity
AU - Humphrey, Jacquelyn E.
AU - Lee, Darren D.
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - We investigate the performance and risk of Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) equity funds in the Australian market and find no significant difference between the returns of SRI and conventional funds. In an extension to prior literature, we examine the impact of the number of positive, negative and total screens funds impose on performance and risk. We find little evidence of positive or negative screening impacting total return, but find weak evidence that funds with more screens overall provide better risk-adjusted performance. Positive screening significantly reduces funds' risk. However, negative screening significantly increases risk and reduces funds' abilities to form diversified portfolios.
AB - We investigate the performance and risk of Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) equity funds in the Australian market and find no significant difference between the returns of SRI and conventional funds. In an extension to prior literature, we examine the impact of the number of positive, negative and total screens funds impose on performance and risk. We find little evidence of positive or negative screening impacting total return, but find weak evidence that funds with more screens overall provide better risk-adjusted performance. Positive screening significantly reduces funds' risk. However, negative screening significantly increases risk and reduces funds' abilities to form diversified portfolios.
KW - Australia
KW - SRI funds
KW - Socially Responsible Investment
KW - mutual funds
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860410719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10551-011-0836-7
DO - 10.1007/s10551-011-0836-7
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-4544
VL - 102
SP - 519
EP - 535
JO - Journal of Business Ethics
JF - Journal of Business Ethics
IS - 4
ER -