Australian songbird body size tracks climate variation: 82 species over 50 years

Janet L. Gardner*, Tatsuya Amano, Anne Peters, William J. Sutherland, Brendan MacKey, Leo Joseph, John Stein, Karen Ikin, Roellen Little, Jesse Smith, Matthew R.E. Symonds

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The observed variation in the body size responses of endotherms to climate change may be explained by two hypotheses: The size increases with climate variability (the starvation resistance hypothesis) and the size shrinks as mean temperatures rise (the heat exchange hypothesis). Across 82 Australian passerine species over 50 years, shrinkingwas associated with annual mean temperature rise exceeding 0.012°C driven by rising winter temperatures for arid and temperate zone species. We propose the warming winters hypothesis to explain this response. However, where average summer temperatures exceeded 34°C, species experiencing annual rise over 0.0116°C tended towards increasing size. Results suggest a broad-scale physiological response to changing climate, with size trends probably reflecting the relative strength of selection pressures across a climatic regime. Critically, a given amount of temperature change will have varying effects on phenotype depending on the season in which it occurs, masking the generality of size patterns associated with temperature change. Rather than phenotypic plasticity, and assuming body size is heritable, results suggest selective loss or gain of particular phenotypes could generate evolutionary change but may be difficult to detect with currentwarming rates.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number20192258
    JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
    Volume286
    Issue number1916
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 Dec 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Australian songbird body size tracks climate variation: 82 species over 50 years'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this