Australia's Defence White Paper realistic, not radical

John Blaxland

Australia's Defence White Paper realistic, not radical

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › General Article

Abstract

The Hobbesian tones of Australias new Defence White Paper of 2016 (DWP16) have been noted already and most have come to see the concepts and capability proposals outlined in DWP16 as being reasonable and relatively balanced. There are those who suggest alternatives, but they involve taking significant political and strategic risks which DWP16 has steered away from

Original language	English
Specialist publication	East Asia Forum
Publication status	Published - 2016

Cite this

@misc{f1f443a7f747417fa02e69b1bad2ad60,

title = "Australia's Defence White Paper realistic, not radical",

abstract = "The Hobbesian tones of Australias new Defence White Paper of 2016 (DWP16) have been noted already and most have come to see the concepts and capability proposals outlined in DWP16 as being reasonable and relatively balanced. There are those who suggest alternatives, but they involve taking significant political and strategic risks which DWP16 has steered away from",

author = "John Blaxland",

year = "2016",

language = "English",

journal = "East Asia Forum",

publisher = "Australian National University ",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Australia's Defence White Paper realistic, not radical

AU - Blaxland, John

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The Hobbesian tones of Australias new Defence White Paper of 2016 (DWP16) have been noted already and most have come to see the concepts and capability proposals outlined in DWP16 as being reasonable and relatively balanced. There are those who suggest alternatives, but they involve taking significant political and strategic risks which DWP16 has steered away from

AB - The Hobbesian tones of Australias new Defence White Paper of 2016 (DWP16) have been noted already and most have come to see the concepts and capability proposals outlined in DWP16 as being reasonable and relatively balanced. There are those who suggest alternatives, but they involve taking significant political and strategic risks which DWP16 has steered away from

M3 - General Article

JO - East Asia Forum

JF - East Asia Forum

ER -