Australia's different defence policy

Hugh White*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Defence-policy debates in many countries over the past two decades have revolved around the choice between new and old wars. Should we build forces suited to the small wars of the post-Cold War era, especially expeditionary interventions of various sorts against non-state adversaries or relatively weak rogue states? Or should we keep on spending money to build forces suited to the kind of large-scale, conventional wars which characterised the last century? Australia has been no exception to this. Indeed the contest between 's new's and 's old's visions of defence priorities among Australia's small strategic-policy community has been unusually intense.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)173-184
    Number of pages12
    JournalSurvival
    Volume51
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Australia's different defence policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this