TY - JOUR
T1 - Autonomous stores
T2 - How levels of in-store automation affect store patronage
AU - Benoit, Sabine
AU - Altrichter, Birgit
AU - Grewal, Dhruv
AU - Ahlbom, Carl Philip
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Autonomous stores operate without needing on -site staff present to support and monitor customers. This study seeks to determine which autonomous stores are most likely to succeed. By adapting convenience theory and drawing on secondary and qualitative data, the authors identify unique features of autonomous stores that constitute convenience dimensions: options for check -in (access convenience), staff support (assistance convenience), check -out (transaction convenience), and to allow customers to check their itemized baskets (verification convenience). Perceptions of convenience, autonomy, and safety explain the influences of unique store features. A conjoint experiment provides a test of the direct effects of each dimension on store patronage and indirect effects through convenience, autonomy, and safety perceptions. The results indicate that, with the exception of check -out, consumers prefer staffed stores; having to check in (e.g., with a credit card), limited access to (remote) staff, and an inability to verify the basket before payment represent significant barriers. In turn, some trade-offs arise: Store features that increase convenience and autonomy undermine safety perceptions. Finally, community-based and rural locations are better suited for autonomous stores than anonymous traffic hubs. Retail managers can leverage these findings to decide whether to establish autonomous stores and, if so, with which design. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of New York University. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
AB - Autonomous stores operate without needing on -site staff present to support and monitor customers. This study seeks to determine which autonomous stores are most likely to succeed. By adapting convenience theory and drawing on secondary and qualitative data, the authors identify unique features of autonomous stores that constitute convenience dimensions: options for check -in (access convenience), staff support (assistance convenience), check -out (transaction convenience), and to allow customers to check their itemized baskets (verification convenience). Perceptions of convenience, autonomy, and safety explain the influences of unique store features. A conjoint experiment provides a test of the direct effects of each dimension on store patronage and indirect effects through convenience, autonomy, and safety perceptions. The results indicate that, with the exception of check -out, consumers prefer staffed stores; having to check in (e.g., with a credit card), limited access to (remote) staff, and an inability to verify the basket before payment represent significant barriers. In turn, some trade-offs arise: Store features that increase convenience and autonomy undermine safety perceptions. Finally, community-based and rural locations are better suited for autonomous stores than anonymous traffic hubs. Retail managers can leverage these findings to decide whether to establish autonomous stores and, if so, with which design. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of New York University. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
KW - Autonomous retail
KW - Autonomous stores
KW - Convenience theory
KW - Retail patronage
KW - Retail technology
KW - Store patronage
KW - Unstaffed stores
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182352760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jretai.2023.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jretai.2023.12.003
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-4359
VL - 100
SP - 217
EP - 238
JO - Journal of Retailing
JF - Journal of Retailing
IS - 2
ER -