“Back-stage” dissent: student Twitter use addressing instructor ideology

Darren L. Linvill*, Brandon C. Boatwright, Will J. Grant

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this content analysis, we explored how students address instructor ideology in the university classroom through the social media platform Twitter. We employed Boolean search operators through Salesforce Marketing Cloud Radian6 software to gather tweets and identified English language tweets by how students referenced their instructor's ideology. Tweets originated in the United States (U.S.), the United Kingdom (U.K.), and Australia. Using qualitative coding procedures, we identified seven themes in the data that described how students wrote about instructor ideology on Twitter: venting regarding instructor's ideology, sharing classroom anecdote, affirming instructor's beliefs/actions, expressing grade concern, articulating an opposing view, reporting conflict, and indicating confusion. Across categories, Twitter was employed primarily as a back-stage means to communicate expressive dissent regarding instructor ideology and also to demonstrate students’ identity. We identified differences between categories based on the perceived ideology of the students’ instructors as well as differences in the number of tweets per capita originating in each country.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)125-143
    Number of pages19
    JournalCommunication Education
    Volume67
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '“Back-stage” dissent: student Twitter use addressing instructor ideology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this