Backbones and backdoors in satisfiability

Philip Kilby*, John Slaney, Sylvie Thiébaux, Toby Walsh

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

    107 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We study the backbone and the backdoors of prepositional satisfiability problems. We make a number of theoretical, algorithmic and experimental contributions. From a theoretical perspective, we prove that backbones are hard even to approximate. From an algorithmic perspective, we present a number of different procedures for computing backdoors. From an empirical perspective, we study the correlation between being in the backbone and in a backdoor. Experiments show that there tends to be very little overlap between backbones and backdoors. We also study problem hardness for the Davis Putnam procedure. Problem hardness appears to be correlated with the size of strong backdoors, and weakly correlated with the size of the backbone, but does not appear to be correlated to the size of weak backdoors nor their number. Finally, to isolate the effect of backdoors, we look at problems with no backbone.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages1368-1373
    Number of pages6
    Publication statusPublished - 2005
    Event20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 17th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, AAAI-05/IAAI-05 - Pittsburgh, PA, United States
    Duration: 9 Jul 200513 Jul 2005

    Conference

    Conference20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 17th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, AAAI-05/IAAI-05
    Country/TerritoryUnited States
    CityPittsburgh, PA
    Period9/07/0513/07/05

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Backbones and backdoors in satisfiability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this