Background Specificity in Forensic Voice Comparison and Its Relation to the Bayesian Prior Probability

Michael Wagner, Yuko Kinoshita

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study investigates the effect of background data specifici-ty on likelihood ratio and prior odds, and consequently on the posterior odds outcome. It is motivated by discussions on the correct choice of speaker recognition background, particularly in forensic voice comparison. We performed strictly controlled experiments with the ANDOSL database where background specificity is the sole independent variable. Results show that target and non-target scores are better separated with less spe-cific background, but that in turn priors must be adjusted down. Because the risk of class recognition instead of individ-ual recognition increases with lower background specificity, we suggest that the prior probability in the Bayes formula is factorised into one part that remains in the domain of the trier of fact as is conventional and another part that is related to the specificity of the assumed or agreed background.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the Sixteenth Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology
    EditorsChristopher Carignan and Michael D. Tyler
    Place of PublicationParramatta, Australia
    PublisherThe Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association, Inc.
    Pages353-356
    EditionPeer Reviewed
    ISBN (Print)2207-1296
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    EventSixteenth Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology - Parramatta, Australia
    Duration: 1 Jan 2016 → …
    http://www.assta.org/sst/2016/SST2016_Proceedings.pdf

    Conference

    ConferenceSixteenth Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology
    Period1/01/16 → …
    OtherDecember 6-9 2016
    Internet address

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Background Specificity in Forensic Voice Comparison and Its Relation to the Bayesian Prior Probability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this