Ban Non Wat: Crucial research, but is it too soon for certainty?

Peter Bellwood*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    As Charles Higham so rightly states, chronology is a major key to unlocking the prehistoric past, perhaps even the master key. Most readers nowadays will agree that the chronologies for the inceptions of farming and bronze working in north-east Thailand, as put forward in the 1970s, were in error, for the simple reason that archaeologists at that time were prone to sending small scattered fragments of charcoal to C14 laboratories without really trying to understand exactly how and where the charcoal originated. I am sure I have been guilty of similar lapses, so apportioning blame is not on my mind and would indeed be pointless.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1224-1226
    Number of pages3
    JournalAntiquity
    Volume89
    Issue number347
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ban Non Wat: Crucial research, but is it too soon for certainty?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this