'Barbarians' and 'Radicals' against the Legitimate Community? - Cultural Othering through Discourses on Legitimacy of Human Rights

Dorota Gozdecka

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article focuses on the mutations of rights from instruments of inclusion to instruments of exclusion. It focuses on multiple exclusionary interpretations of legitimacy of international human rights law that create and propagate otherness. The text analyses the understanding and role of legitimate community of rights in contemporary crises of recognition and critically evaluates how this notion excludes those deemed too different to belong. The article does so primarily in light of managing religious difference and argues that European human rights regimes have created two distinct categories of dissidents seen as subversive and a priori excluded from the protection of rights the barbarians and the radicals. This analysis begins with a discussion of the theoretical notions of rights and legal legitimacy and their application in contemporary human rights case-law. It subsequently theorises the consequences of legitimising a homogenously constructed community as the ultimate authority and its impact on reversal of the emancipatory potential of rights.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)101-126
    JournalNo foundations: an interdisciplinary journal of law and justice
    Volume15
    Issue number2018
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''Barbarians' and 'Radicals' against the Legitimate Community? - Cultural Othering through Discourses on Legitimacy of Human Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this