Benchmarking for fisheries governance

R. Quentin Grafton*, Tom Kompas, Richard McLoughlin, Nick Rayns

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    49 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The paper develops a benchmarking framework to improve fisheries governance and promote resilient ecosystems and profitable fisheries. The benchmarking includes five key components: accountability, transparency, incentives, risk assessment and management; and adaptability. Collectively, these factors provide a framework to benchmark and improve fisheries governance. Initial findings from benchmarking in two of Australia's Commonwealth fisheries indicate that the framework provides an important tool to help overcome the underlying causes of unsustainability in capture fisheries-poor and/or ineffective fisheries governance.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)470-479
    Number of pages10
    JournalMarine Policy
    Volume31
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Benchmarking for fisheries governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this