Abstract
Legal hybrids have the potential to address justice and development issues in conflicted and postconflict settings. Using the Philippine Shariah court system as case study, this article demonstrates that state hybrids suffer from legitimacy and capacity issues that also constrain their ability to deliver effective justice services and respond to conflict challenges. Forging cooperative networks between secular courts and Shariah courts and between local justice personnel and central justice authorities can enhance the effectiveness and legitimacy of a formalized legal hybrid. This can assist in addressing the justice deficit that fuels the cycle of conflict and sustain peacebuilding efforts at post-conflict.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Place of Publication | Canberra, Australia |
Commissioning body | Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |