TY - JOUR
T1 - Biodiversity Conservation in the REDD
AU - Paoli, Gary D.
AU - Wells, Philip L.
AU - Meijaard, Erik
AU - Struebig, Matthew J.
AU - Marshall, Andrew J.
AU - Obidzinski, Krystof
AU - Tan, Aseng
AU - Rafiastanto, Andjar
AU - Yaap, Betsy
AU - Ferry Slik, JW W.
AU - Morel, Alexandra
AU - Perumal, Balu
AU - Wielaard, Niels
AU - Husson, Simon
AU - D'Arcy, Laura
PY - 2010/11/23
Y1 - 2010/11/23
N2 - Deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tropics also harbour more than half the world's threatened species, raising the possibility that reducing GHG emissions by curtailing tropical deforestation could provide substantial co-benefits for biodiversity conservation. Here we explore the potential for such co-benefits in Indonesia, a leading source of GHG emissions from land cover and land use change, and among the most species-rich countries in the world. We show that focal ecosystems for interventions to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in Indonesia do not coincide with areas supporting the most species-rich communities or highest concentration of threatened species. We argue that inherent trade-offs among ecosystems in emission reduction potential, opportunity cost of foregone development and biodiversity values will require a regulatory framework to balance emission reduction interventions with biodiversity co-benefit targets. We discuss how such a regulatory framework might function, and caution that pursuing emission reduction strategies without such a framework may undermine, not enhance, long-term prospects for biodiversity conservation in the tropics.
AB - Deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tropics also harbour more than half the world's threatened species, raising the possibility that reducing GHG emissions by curtailing tropical deforestation could provide substantial co-benefits for biodiversity conservation. Here we explore the potential for such co-benefits in Indonesia, a leading source of GHG emissions from land cover and land use change, and among the most species-rich countries in the world. We show that focal ecosystems for interventions to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in Indonesia do not coincide with areas supporting the most species-rich communities or highest concentration of threatened species. We argue that inherent trade-offs among ecosystems in emission reduction potential, opportunity cost of foregone development and biodiversity values will require a regulatory framework to balance emission reduction interventions with biodiversity co-benefit targets. We discuss how such a regulatory framework might function, and caution that pursuing emission reduction strategies without such a framework may undermine, not enhance, long-term prospects for biodiversity conservation in the tropics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78549240617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1750-0680-5-7
DO - 10.1186/1750-0680-5-7
M3 - Comment/debate
SN - 1750-0680
VL - 5
JO - Carbon Balance and Management
JF - Carbon Balance and Management
M1 - 7
ER -