Bone projectile points in Prehistoric Australia: Evidence from archaeologically recovered implements, ethnography, and rock art

Harry Allen, Michelle C. Langley*, Paul S.C. Taçon

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    While osseous projectile points are frequently recovered and well understood in African and European contexts, those from Pleistocene Australia remain vaguely reported. This chapter outlines the current evidence for prehistoric osseous projectile technology on the Australian continent through the integration of data from archaeologically recovered implements, rock art, and ethnography. Organic implements are recovered only rarely from Pleistocene archaeological contexts in Australia, however, in ethnographic times, a wide range of both bone and wooden projectile technologies were used for hunting and defense. Spears played a significant part in Aboriginal economies, mythological traditions, and in the reproduction of gender roles. This chapter will show that while the evidence for osseous prehistoric projectile technology in Australia is less rich than in other regions of the world, owing to a variety of reasons including taphonomic processes and the ready availability of alternative materials, the Australian data nevertheless contributes to a greater understanding of Pleistocene technological choices as well as cultural variability during this period.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationVertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology
    PublisherSpringer
    Pages209-218
    Number of pages10
    Edition9789402408973
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Publication series

    NameVertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology
    Number9789402408973
    ISSN (Print)1877-9077

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bone projectile points in Prehistoric Australia: Evidence from archaeologically recovered implements, ethnography, and rock art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this