TY - JOUR
T1 - Building age-inclusive disaster risk reduction
T2 - Insights among geographically mobile young adults in regional Australia
AU - Heffernan, Timothy
AU - Shearing, Clifford
AU - Sanderson, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/10/15
Y1 - 2024/10/15
N2 - Community centred disaster risk reduction (DRR) is viewed as the gold standard, linking local networks, skills, capacities and knowledges together with government and nongovernment supports. However, despite the best of intentions young adults still experience exclusion due in part to adult centrism because initiatives are largely curated by adults. While research has sought to address this bias, outmigration by young adults at key life-stages creates an additional barrier. This paper identifies the need to pair life-stage with DRR objectives to improve understandings of what counts as ‘inclusion’ and ‘participation’. Interviews (N = 14) with young adults aged 18–30 in a bushfire affected area of Australia were conducted three years after disaster. Findings suggest participation is an essentially contested concept among adults and young adults, leading to tension and entrenched age-based exclusion. Further, young adult's geographic mobility, seen as a rite of passage, compounds exclusion, despite it developing their maturity. The paper concludes with a discussion of the conditions for creating age-inclusive DRR, including the need for social infrastructure catering to young adults and the importance of communities acknowledging young adults' diverse, age-specific interests.
AB - Community centred disaster risk reduction (DRR) is viewed as the gold standard, linking local networks, skills, capacities and knowledges together with government and nongovernment supports. However, despite the best of intentions young adults still experience exclusion due in part to adult centrism because initiatives are largely curated by adults. While research has sought to address this bias, outmigration by young adults at key life-stages creates an additional barrier. This paper identifies the need to pair life-stage with DRR objectives to improve understandings of what counts as ‘inclusion’ and ‘participation’. Interviews (N = 14) with young adults aged 18–30 in a bushfire affected area of Australia were conducted three years after disaster. Findings suggest participation is an essentially contested concept among adults and young adults, leading to tension and entrenched age-based exclusion. Further, young adult's geographic mobility, seen as a rite of passage, compounds exclusion, despite it developing their maturity. The paper concludes with a discussion of the conditions for creating age-inclusive DRR, including the need for social infrastructure catering to young adults and the importance of communities acknowledging young adults' diverse, age-specific interests.
KW - Adult centrism
KW - Bushfire
KW - Exclusion
KW - Recovery
KW - Young adults
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203830029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104813
DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104813
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85203830029
SN - 2212-4209
VL - 113
JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
M1 - 104813
ER -