Abstract
The provision of 'distant' care to older people living at home through telecare technologies is often contrasted negatively to hands-on, face-to-face care: telecare is seen as a loss of care, a dehumanization. Here we challenge this view, arguing that teleoperators in telecare services do provide care to older people, often at significant emotional cost to themselves. Based on a European Commission-funded ethnographic study of two English telecare monitoring centres, we argue that telecare is not 'disembodied' work, but a form of care performed through the use of voice, knowledge sharing and emotional labour or self-management. We also show, in distinction to discourses promoting telecare in the UK, that successful telecare relies on the existence of social networks and the availability of hands-on care. Telecare is not a substitute for, or the opposite of, hands-on care but is at its best interwoven with it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 490-506 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Sociology |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Calling for Care: 'Disembodied' Work, Teleoperators and Older People Living at Home'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver