TY - JOUR
T1 - Can we learn anything from health care in the united states?
AU - Anstey, Matthew H.R.
AU - Elshaug, Adam G.
AU - Russell, Lesley M.
AU - Wells, Susan
PY - 2014/6/2
Y1 - 2014/6/2
N2 - • Some aspects of health care in the United States would be beneficial to Australia and New Zealand, but others should be avoided.• Positive aspects, which should be emulated, include: • health care reform that is focused on the continuum of care and patient-centred care • trials of new models to organise, deliver and pay for health care services, where quality of care is rewarded over quantity of services • an integral view of, and strong support for, health services research as a means of evaluating reforms aimed at improving patient outcomes and systems-level efficiencies • physician engagement in reforms - for example, participating in the Choosing Wisely initiative, and trialling and implementing new payment models that are not fee-for-service. • Negative aspects, which should be avoided, include: • increasingly fragmented provider and financing structures (funding provided by state and federal governments, private insurance and out-of-pocket costs) that cause frustration in terms of access and care coordination and increase administrative waste • an overemphasis on technological solutions, with insufficient acknowledgment of the importance of addressing value in health care • a focus on hospital and doctor-based health care rather than environmental and social inputs into health.
AB - • Some aspects of health care in the United States would be beneficial to Australia and New Zealand, but others should be avoided.• Positive aspects, which should be emulated, include: • health care reform that is focused on the continuum of care and patient-centred care • trials of new models to organise, deliver and pay for health care services, where quality of care is rewarded over quantity of services • an integral view of, and strong support for, health services research as a means of evaluating reforms aimed at improving patient outcomes and systems-level efficiencies • physician engagement in reforms - for example, participating in the Choosing Wisely initiative, and trialling and implementing new payment models that are not fee-for-service. • Negative aspects, which should be avoided, include: • increasingly fragmented provider and financing structures (funding provided by state and federal governments, private insurance and out-of-pocket costs) that cause frustration in terms of access and care coordination and increase administrative waste • an overemphasis on technological solutions, with insufficient acknowledgment of the importance of addressing value in health care • a focus on hospital and doctor-based health care rather than environmental and social inputs into health.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903753683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5694/mja13.11357
DO - 10.5694/mja13.11357
M3 - Article
SN - 0025-729X
VL - 200
SP - 526
EP - 528
JO - Medical Journal of Australia
JF - Medical Journal of Australia
IS - 9
ER -