Canadian rhapsody: Copyright law and research libraries

Matthew Rimmer*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article considers the ground-breaking Supreme Court of Canada decision in The Law Society of Upper Canada v CCH Canadian Limited The matter involved legal publishers bringing an action for infringement against the Law Society of Upper Canada for operating a photocopy and custom copy service at the Great Library of Osgoode Hall. The Supreme Court of Canada decision laid down important precedents in relation to originality, authorisation, and the defence of fair dealing. The ruling has been hailed as ‘one of the strongest pro-user rights decisions from any high court in the world, showing what it means to do more than pay mere lip service to balance in copyright’. This decision will have important implications for the regulation of new technologies. The approach has been applied in two decisions dealing with law and the internet—the Canadian Federal Court case of BMG Canada v John Doe, and the Supreme Court of Canada ‘Tariff 22’ case. The Supreme Court of Canada decision in The Law Society of Upper Canada v CCH Canadian Limited provides an impetus to reconsider the judicial interpretation of user rights in Australian jurisprudence.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)193-213
    Number of pages21
    JournalAustralian Academic and Research Libraries
    Volume35
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Canadian rhapsody: Copyright law and research libraries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this