Candyfloss, Lego and Hope: What sort of scientist is Jodie Whittaker's Doctor?

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    Since the 1980s, calls for a woman to be cast as Doctor Whos Doctor have partly been based on the notion that the Doctor is a scientist, and that a woman in the role would challenge sexist preconceptions about women in science. In this chapter we discuss the kinds of science role model embodied by the Doctor, and in particular by Jodie Whittakers take on the character during her first season. First, we discuss whether she and previous incarnations can even be considered scientists. We reflect on the Doctors self-descriptors, plus definitions of scientist from history and sociology, and show that strictly speaking they dont fit the scientist label very well. Second, labels aside, we examine the scientific flavor of Whittakers Doctor. As someone with vast knowledge and technical skills who engages in scientific-type activities, what ideological values does she embody with respect to science? Finally, we propose that she embodies a version of expertise we call scientific stewardship. This model emphasizes the ethical application of knowledge to benefit society, future generations and other species. We argue that in her peculiarly down-to-Earth version of this, Whittakers Doctor sets a new benchmark for scientific role models in Doctor Who.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDoctor Who and Science
    EditorsMarcus K. Harmes and Lindy A. Orthia
    Place of PublicationUSA
    PublisherMcFarland & Co.
    Pages110-126
    Volume1
    Edition1
    ISBN (Print)978-1-4766-8112-2
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Candyfloss, Lego and Hope: What sort of scientist is Jodie Whittaker's Doctor?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this