Carbon emission trading system of China: A linked market vs. separated markets

Yu Liu*, Shenghao Feng, Songfeng Cai, Yaxiong Zhang, Xiang Zhou, Yanbin Chen, Zhanming Chen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The Chinese government intends to upgrade its current provincial carbon emission trading pilots to a nationwide scheme by 2015. This study investigates two of scenarios: separated provincial markets and a linked inter-provincial market. The carbon abatement effects of separated and linked markets are compared using two pilot provinces of Hubei and Guangdong based on a computable general equilibrium model termed Sino-TERMCo2. Simulation results show that the linked market can improve social welfare and reduce carbon emission intensity for the nation as well as for the Hubei-Guangdong bloc compared to the separated market. However, the combined system also distributes welfare more unevenly and thus increases social inequity. On the policy ground, the current results suggest that a well-constructed, nationwide carbon market complemented with adequate welfare transfer policies can be employed to replace the current top-down abatement target disaggregation practice.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)465-479
    Number of pages15
    JournalFrontiers of Earth Science
    Volume7
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Carbon emission trading system of China: A linked market vs. separated markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this