TY - JOUR
T1 - Caregiver rating bias in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease
T2 - Impact of caregiver burden and depression on dyadic rating discrepancy across domains
AU - Pfeifer, Livia
AU - Drobetz, Reinhard
AU - Fankhauser, Sonja
AU - Mortby, Moyra E.
AU - Maercker, Andreas
AU - Forstmeier, Simon
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - Background: Caregivers of individuals with dementia are biased in their rating of mental health measures o. The care receiver. This study examines caregiver burden and depression as predictors of this bias for mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease in different domains. Methods: The sample consisted of 202 persons: 60 with mild cognitive impairment, 41 with mild Alzheimer's disease, and 101 caregivers. Discrepancy scores were calculated by subtractin. The mean caregiver score fro. The respective mean patient score o. The following assessment instruments. The Geriatric Depression Scale, Apathy Evaluation Scale, Bayer-Activities of Daily Living Scale, and Quality of Life-AD scale. Caregiver burden and depression were assessed b. The Zarit Burden Interview an. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were low for apathy (0.38), daily functioning (0.38), and quality of life (0.30) and moderate for depression (0.49). These domains showed negative rating discrepancies, which indicates caregiver rating bias for all four domains. Regression analyses revealed that caregiver burden significantly contributed to explaining these discrepancies i. The domains apathy, daily functioning, and quality of life. Conclusion: Caregiver rating bias can be attributed to caregiver burden. When caregiver burden is present, data based on caregiver ratings should therefore be interpreted with caution.
AB - Background: Caregivers of individuals with dementia are biased in their rating of mental health measures o. The care receiver. This study examines caregiver burden and depression as predictors of this bias for mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease in different domains. Methods: The sample consisted of 202 persons: 60 with mild cognitive impairment, 41 with mild Alzheimer's disease, and 101 caregivers. Discrepancy scores were calculated by subtractin. The mean caregiver score fro. The respective mean patient score o. The following assessment instruments. The Geriatric Depression Scale, Apathy Evaluation Scale, Bayer-Activities of Daily Living Scale, and Quality of Life-AD scale. Caregiver burden and depression were assessed b. The Zarit Burden Interview an. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were low for apathy (0.38), daily functioning (0.38), and quality of life (0.30) and moderate for depression (0.49). These domains showed negative rating discrepancies, which indicates caregiver rating bias for all four domains. Regression analyses revealed that caregiver burden significantly contributed to explaining these discrepancies i. The domains apathy, daily functioning, and quality of life. Conclusion: Caregiver rating bias can be attributed to caregiver burden. When caregiver burden is present, data based on caregiver ratings should therefore be interpreted with caution.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - Anosognosia
KW - Caregiver
KW - Dyadic data
KW - Mild cognitive impairment
KW - Rating discrepancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880121418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1041610213000562
DO - 10.1017/S1041610213000562
M3 - Article
SN - 1041-6102
VL - 25
SP - 1345
EP - 1355
JO - International Psychogeriatrics
JF - International Psychogeriatrics
IS - 8
ER -