"Catherine, you're wasting your time": Address terms within the Australian political interview

Johanna Rendle-Short*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    57 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Analysis of the political news interview in the lead-up to the Australian 2004 federal election shows that both journalists and politicians address their co-participant by name. However, there are differences both in choice of address term and in the positioning of address terms within the news interview. Journalists tend to use pre-positioned address terms when addressing politicians either by their institutional role (e.g. Prime Minister) or by title plus last name (e.g. Mr Howard). Politicians, on the other hand, always address journalists by first name (e.g. Catherine) and have more flexibility in terms of where they position the address term. In addition, whereas journalists tend to use address terms as a technique for managing the organisational aspects of the political news interview, politicians tend to use address terms within adversarial environments, as a resource for taking the turn, for resolving overlapping talk, or for delaying a dispreferred response. The aim of this paper is, using conversation analysis, to show the multiple interactional uses of address terms within the context of the Australian political news interview.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1503-1525
    Number of pages23
    JournalJournal of Pragmatics
    Volume39
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '"Catherine, you're wasting your time": Address terms within the Australian political interview'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this