CeasIng Cpap At standarD criteriA (CICADA): predicting a successful outcome

Yue Yin, Margaret Broom, Audrey Wright, Donna Hovey, Mohamed E. Abdel-Latif, Bruce Shadbolt, David A. Todd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This is a retrospective analysis of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) where we concluded that CeasIng Cpap At standerD criteriA (CICADA) in premature babies (PBs) < 30 weeks gestational age (GA) was the significantly better method of ceasing CPAP. To identify factors that may influence the number of attempts to cease CPAP, we reviewed the records of 50 PBs from the RCT who used the CICADA method. PBs were grouped according to number of attempts to cease CPAP (fast group a parts per thousand currency sign2 attempts and slow group > 2 attempts to cease CPAP). There were 26 (fast group) and 24 (slow group) PBs included in the analysis. Results showed significant differences in mean GA (27.8 +/- 0.3 vs 26.9 +/- 0.3 [weeks +/- SE], p = 0.03) and birth weight ([Bwt]; 1080 +/- 48.8 vs 899 +/- 45.8 [grams +/- SE], p = 0.01) between groups. Significantly fewer PBs in the fast group had a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) compared to the slow group (5/26 (19.2 %) vs 13/24 (54.2 %), p = 0.02). Bwt was a significant negative predictor of CPAP duration (r = -0.497, p = 0.03) and CPAP ceasing attempts (r = -0.290, p = 0.04).Conclusion: PBs with a higher GA and Bwt without a PDA ceased CPAP earlier using the CICADA method. Bwt was better than GA for predicting CPAP duration and attempts to cease CPAP.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-87
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Pediatrics
Volume175
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CeasIng Cpap At standarD criteriA (CICADA): predicting a successful outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this