Challenges to Australia’s national health policy from trade and investment agreements

Deborah H. Gleeson*, Kyla S. Tienhaara, Thomas A. Faunce

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In its Trade Policy Statement of April 2011, the Australian Government committed to “preserve the right of Australian governments to make laws in important public policy areas” and to reject provisions in trade agreements that could “limit its capacity to put health warnings or plain packaging requirements on tobacco products or its ability to continue the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme”.1 One forum in which this resolve is likely to be tested is the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) negotiations. The TPPA is a proposed regional free trade agreement between Australia, Brunei, Chile, Malaysia, Peru, Singapore, New Zealand, the United States and Vietnam — a diverse assortment of countries from several continents around the Pacific rim. The TPPA differs from existing bilateral and regional free trade agreements in its sheer size and geographic diversity. It has the potential to restrict national policy space — “the freedom, scope and mechanisms that governments have to choose, design and implement public policies to fulfil their aims”2 — on an unprecedented scale.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-356
Number of pages3
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume196
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges to Australia’s national health policy from trade and investment agreements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this