Chapter III of the constitution, federal jurisdiction and dialogue charters of human rights

Will Bateman*, James Stellios

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The High Court's decision in Momcilovic v The Queen is the first to consider the compatibility of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities 2006 (Vic) with ch III of the Constitution. The decision will have significant implications for the continuing effectiveness of key provisions of the Charter, the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) and any future federal charter of human rights. This article analyses the decision and evaluates its implications for the dialogue model of statutory human rights protection in Australia. It also considers several controversial statements concerning the principles of federal jurisdiction that arise from the decision.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-40
    Number of pages40
    JournalMelbourne University Law Review
    Volume36
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Chapter III of the constitution, federal jurisdiction and dialogue charters of human rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this