Charlie Hebdo attacks provide a false pretext for 18C debate

Simon Rice

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationGeneral Article

    Abstract

    Early in 2014, federal Attorney-General George Brandis released a proposal to significantly amend our law against racial vilification, Sections 18C and 18D of the Racial Discrimination Act, on the strength, it seems, of a promise to Andrew Bolt. After widespread condemnation the proposal was abandoned. No bill was ever tabled in parliament. The proposal was a radical watering down of the protection against racial vilification. It would have shifted the free speech balance so far that almost anything could be said with impunity
    Original languageEnglish
    No.Online
    Specialist publicationThe Conversation
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Charlie Hebdo attacks provide a false pretext for 18C debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this