Childhood bads, parenting goods, and the right to procreate

Sarah Hannan*, R. J. Leland

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Harry Brighouse and Adam Swift, together with many other philosophers, think that adults’ interests in raising a child can give them a moral right to parent when they will be adequate parents. We consider whether the same interest could give such adults a moral right to procreate, as a means of acquiring a child to raise. We argue that the interest in parenting cannot support a right to procreate, because the features of childhood that make parenting uniquely valuable for adults are bad for children. Adults may have a right to procreate, but they do not have that right due to their interest in a parent–child relationship.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)366-384
    Number of pages19
    JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
    Volume21
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Childhood bads, parenting goods, and the right to procreate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this