China's diplomatic strategies in response to economic disputes in Myanmar

Debby Sze Wan Chan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How do societal actors in the host country matter to Beijing's diplomatic strategies? In the course of political transition in Myanmar, the Myitsone Dam was suspended in 2011, and the China-Myanmar High-Speed Railway was reportedly halted in 2014. Since then, Beijing is said to have adopted public diplomacy in response to these economic setbacks. However, this article finds variations in Beijing's approaches; Beijing actively engaged with the dam challengers, but not the railway opponents, who offered less of a challenge. Moreover, Beijing tolerated the project's suspension in the dam case, but ramped up pressure in the railway case by increasing Naypyitaw's costs of defection. Beijing's inconsistent diplomatic approaches are attributed to different levels of social opposition observed in the anti-Chinese project movements. As such, Beijing has the propensity to bypass societal actors and pressure Naypyitaw for project continuation if it perceives that social opposition is not a major obstacle in bilateral economic cooperation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-336
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'China's diplomatic strategies in response to economic disputes in Myanmar'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this