Chinese investment in Australia needs closer scrutiny

Geoffrey Wade

Chinese investment in Australia needs closer scrutiny

Geoffrey Wade

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › General Article

Abstract

The call on this page by Linda ÂJakobson and Andrew Parker for a national debate on Chinese investment (25/2) omitted much in terms of what needs to be discussed on this crucial question. The implicit argument, that Chinese investment in Australia should be further facilitated, is ÂneiÂther unexpected, given one of the authors makes a living through such investment, nor supported by the arguments presented

Original language	English
Specialist publication	The Australian
Publication status	Published - 2016

Cite this

@misc{9923551020cb49bfb58bdd9c5a75cc00,

title = "Chinese investment in Australia needs closer scrutiny",

abstract = "The call on this page by Linda {\^A}Jakobson and Andrew Parker for a national debate on Chinese investment (25/2) omitted much in terms of what needs to be discussed on this crucial question. The implicit argument, that Chinese investment in Australia should be further facilitated, is {\^A}nei{\^A}ther unexpected, given one of the authors makes a living through such investment, nor supported by the arguments presented",

author = "Geoffrey Wade",

year = "2016",

language = "English",

journal = "The Australian",

publisher = "Nationwide News Pty Ltd",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Chinese investment in Australia needs closer scrutiny

AU - Wade, Geoffrey

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The call on this page by Linda ÂJakobson and Andrew Parker for a national debate on Chinese investment (25/2) omitted much in terms of what needs to be discussed on this crucial question. The implicit argument, that Chinese investment in Australia should be further facilitated, is ÂneiÂther unexpected, given one of the authors makes a living through such investment, nor supported by the arguments presented

AB - The call on this page by Linda ÂJakobson and Andrew Parker for a national debate on Chinese investment (25/2) omitted much in terms of what needs to be discussed on this crucial question. The implicit argument, that Chinese investment in Australia should be further facilitated, is ÂneiÂther unexpected, given one of the authors makes a living through such investment, nor supported by the arguments presented

M3 - General Article

JO - The Australian

JF - The Australian

ER -

Chinese investment in Australia needs closer scrutiny

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this