Chinese populism in the 1920s, extraterritoriality and International Law

Recent scholarship and commentaries on populism and international law
often focus on the rise of right-wing populist regimes in contemporary politics. This paper invites a shift of attention to populism in the (semi)colonies in the process of national liberation and anticolonialism, in order to
achieve a more historically and socially informed understanding about the
relationship between populism and international law. The paper chooses the
populist movements in China against extraterritoriality and imperialism in
the 1920s. I will ask what particular frustrations and ideologies motivated
the populist movements in the 1920s. Drawing on Laclau's theory, I will
analyse why and how exactly these movements were populist. In addition,
the direct and indirect consequences of the Chinese populism will be examined to understand its ramifications not only on the revision of unequal
treaties and the dismantling of extraterritoriality, but more broadly on the
development of international law. Using this historical episode, the paper highlights populism's emancipatory potential of mobilising resistance against
repression and correcting systemic injustice, as well as the intrinsic ambivalence of such potential.