Choice experiments in health: The good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future

Jordan J. Louviere*, Emily Lancsar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

155 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Compared to many applied areas of economics, health economics has a strong tradition in eliciting and using stated preferences (SP) in policy analysis. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are one SP method increasingly used in this area. Literature on DCEs in health and more generally has grown rapidly since the mid-1990s. Applications of DCEs in health have come a long way, but to date few have been 'best practice', in part because 'best practice' has been somewhat of a moving target. The purpose of this paper is to briefly survey the history of DCEs and the state of current knowledge, identify and discuss knowledge gaps, and suggest potentially fruitful areas for future research to fill such gaps with the aim of moving the application of DCEs in health economics closer to best practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-546
Number of pages20
JournalHealth Economics, Policy and Law
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choice experiments in health: The good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this