Choice of Law in Federal Jurisdiction after Rizeq v Western Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article considers the impact of the High Courts decision in Rizeq v Western Australia on choice of law in federal jurisdiction. Section 79(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), along with s 80 of that Act, have been seen as central to choice of law when a court exercises federal jurisdiction. The High Courts decision in Rizeq has reconceptualised the operation of s 79(1) and, while Rizeq was not a choice of law case, the High Courts decision undoubtedly has choice of law implications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-203
JournalAustralian Bar Review
Volume46
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choice of Law in Federal Jurisdiction after Rizeq v Western Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this