Abstract
This article considers the impact of the High Courts decision in Rizeq v Western Australia on choice of law in federal jurisdiction. Section 79(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), along with s 80 of that Act, have been seen as central to choice of law when a court exercises federal jurisdiction. The High Courts decision in Rizeq has reconceptualised the operation of s 79(1) and, while Rizeq was not a choice of law case, the High Courts decision undoubtedly has choice of law implications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 187-203 |
Journal | Australian Bar Review |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |