Abstract
This article considers the impact of the High Courts decision in Rizeq v Western Australia on choice of law in federal jurisdiction. Section 79(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), along with s 80 of that Act, have been seen as central to choice of law when a court exercises federal jurisdiction. The High Courts decision in Rizeq has reconceptualised the operation of s 79(1) and, while Rizeq was not a choice of law case, the High Courts decision undoubtedly has choice of law implications.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 187-203 |
| Journal | Australian Bar Review |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Choice of Law in Federal Jurisdiction after Rizeq v Western Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver