Abstract
This article suggests that Chomsky's notorious 'London' argument against semantics looks much more plausible that it is usually interpreted as being when seen in the light of something apparently remote from its concerns, viz., David Lewis's distinction between natural and non-natural properties.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 16-22 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Analysis |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2015 |