Choosing to study for a PhD: A framework for examining decisions to become a research student

Cally Guerin, Alistair McCulloch, Asangi Jayatilaka, Paul Calder, Damith Ranasinghe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Given its importance to institutions, policy-makers and intending students, there is a surprising lack of research exploring the reasons students choose to undertake a research degree. What studies there are tend to be largely descriptive and the topic lacks a theoreticallyinformed framework through which student decisions can be examined and comparative work developed. We outline such a framework drawing on self-determination theory and social cognitive career theory. Our framework comprises five categories: autonomy; relatedness; competence and self-efficacy; outcome expectations; and, goals. To assess its utility, the framework is used to interrogate data generated through a series of focus groups involving PhD students studying in Australia in the area of information and communications technology. The framework proved capable of organizing data in a robust, comprehensive and coherent way.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)85-106
    JournalHigher Education Review
    Volume49
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing to study for a PhD: A framework for examining decisions to become a research student'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this