Classifying Australian phd theses: Linking research and library practices

Peter Macauley*, Terry Evans, Margot Pearson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article draws on the findings from, and the methods and approach used in the provision of a database of Australian PhD thesis records for the period 1987 to 2006, coded by Research Fields, Courses and Disciplines (RFCD) fields of study. Importantly, the project was not merely the creation of yet another database but something that constitutes a valuable research resource in its own right. The database is significant as it can be used to track knowledge production in Australia over a twenty year period and contains approximately 54,000 bibliographic records. Recommendations for practice relate to university libraries, doctoral candidates, and the coded database.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalAustralian Academic and Research Libraries
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Classifying Australian phd theses: Linking research and library practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this