TY - JOUR
T1 - Classifying, Constructing, and Identifying Life
T2 - Standards as Transformations of "The Biological"
AU - Mackenzie, Adrian
AU - Waterton, Claire
AU - Ellis, Rebecca
AU - Frow, Emma K.
AU - McNally, Ruth
AU - Busch, Lawrence
AU - Wynne, Brian
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - Recent accounts of "the biological" emphasize its thoroughgoing transformation. Accounts of biomedicalization, biotechnology, biopower, biocapital, and bioeconomy tend to agree that twentieth- and twenty-first-century life sciences transform the object of biology, the biological. Amidst so much transformation, we explore attempts to stabilize the biological through standards. We ask: how do standards handle the biological in transformation? Based on ethnographic research, the article discusses three contemporary postgenomic standards that classify, construct, or identify biological forms: the Barcoding of Life Initiative, the BioBricks Assembly Standard, and the Proteomics Standards Initiative. We rely on recent critical analyses of standardization to suggest that any attempt to attribute a fixed property to the biological actually multiplies dependencies between values, materials, and human and nonhuman agents. We highlight ways in which these biological standards cross-validate life forms with forms of life such as publics, infrastructures, and forms of disciplinary compromise. Attempts to standardize the biological, we suggest, offer a good way to see how a life form is always also a form of life.
AB - Recent accounts of "the biological" emphasize its thoroughgoing transformation. Accounts of biomedicalization, biotechnology, biopower, biocapital, and bioeconomy tend to agree that twentieth- and twenty-first-century life sciences transform the object of biology, the biological. Amidst so much transformation, we explore attempts to stabilize the biological through standards. We ask: how do standards handle the biological in transformation? Based on ethnographic research, the article discusses three contemporary postgenomic standards that classify, construct, or identify biological forms: the Barcoding of Life Initiative, the BioBricks Assembly Standard, and the Proteomics Standards Initiative. We rely on recent critical analyses of standardization to suggest that any attempt to attribute a fixed property to the biological actually multiplies dependencies between values, materials, and human and nonhuman agents. We highlight ways in which these biological standards cross-validate life forms with forms of life such as publics, infrastructures, and forms of disciplinary compromise. Attempts to standardize the biological, we suggest, offer a good way to see how a life form is always also a form of life.
KW - biology
KW - infrastructures
KW - proteomics
KW - publics
KW - standards
KW - synthetic biology
KW - taxonomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881153954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0162243912474324
DO - 10.1177/0162243912474324
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84881153954
SN - 0162-2439
VL - 38
SP - 701
EP - 722
JO - Science Technology and Human Values
JF - Science Technology and Human Values
IS - 5
ER -