Abstract
By revisiting the work of Blais and Rae, this article develops a new classification of electoral systems focused on input rules. An Unknown Winning Number family is distinguished from a Quota family with known winning numbers for most of the counting process. Branching family trees are developed and used to help explain some Australian experience with accentuated disproportionality in two electoral systems which have been omitted from otherwise path-breaking recent analysis (Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M.S. 1989. Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press). These omitted systems are identified as effectively giving electors as many votes as seats available in a district. The input-rule family trees remind us that number of votes is an important component of electoral systems, although elusive and somewhat forgotten in much recent analysis. More conventional groupings of electoral systems are identified as output peer groups.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 462-479 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Classifying electoral systems by input rules: Building on Blais and Rae through Australian experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver