TY - JOUR
T1 - Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort
T2 - a CENTER-TBI study
AU - Åkerlund, Cecilia A.I.
AU - Holst, Anders
AU - Stocchetti, Nino
AU - Steyerberg, Ewout W.
AU - Menon, David K.
AU - Ercole, Ari
AU - Nelson, David W.
AU - Åkerlund, Cecilia
AU - Amrein, Krisztina
AU - Andelic, Nada
AU - Andreassen, Lasse
AU - Anke, Audny
AU - Antoni, Anna
AU - Audibert, Gérard
AU - Azouvi, Philippe
AU - Azzolini, Maria Luisa
AU - Bartels, Ronald
AU - Barzó, Pál
AU - Beauvais, Romuald
AU - Beer, Ronny
AU - Bellander, Bo Michael
AU - Belli, Antonio
AU - Benali, Habib
AU - Berardino, Maurizio
AU - Beretta, Luigi
AU - Blaabjerg, Morten
AU - Bragge, Peter
AU - Brazinova, Alexandra
AU - Brinck, Vibeke
AU - Brooker, Joanne
AU - Brorsson, Camilla
AU - Buki, Andras
AU - Bullinger, Monika
AU - Cabeleira, Manuel
AU - Caccioppola, Alessio
AU - Calappi, Emiliana
AU - Calvi, Maria Rosa
AU - Cameron, Peter
AU - Lozano, Guillermo Carbayo
AU - Carbonara, Marco
AU - Cavallo, Simona
AU - Chevallard, Giorgio
AU - Chieregato, Arturo
AU - Citerio, Giuseppe
AU - Clusmann, Hans
AU - Coburn, Mark
AU - Coles, Jonathan
AU - Cooper, Jamie D.
AU - Correia, Marta
AU - Gruen, Russell L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/7/27
Y1 - 2022/7/27
N2 - Background: While the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is one of the strongest outcome predictors, the current classification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as ‘mild’, ‘moderate’ or ‘severe’ based on this fails to capture enormous heterogeneity in pathophysiology and treatment response. We hypothesized that data-driven characterization of TBI could identify distinct endotypes and give mechanistic insights. Methods: We developed an unsupervised statistical clustering model based on a mixture of probabilistic graphs for presentation (< 24 h) demographic, clinical, physiological, laboratory and imaging data to identify subgroups of TBI patients admitted to the intensive care unit in the CENTER-TBI dataset (N = 1,728). A cluster similarity index was used for robust determination of optimal cluster number. Mutual information was used to quantify feature importance and for cluster interpretation. Results: Six stable endotypes were identified with distinct GCS and composite systemic metabolic stress profiles, distinguished by GCS, blood lactate, oxygen saturation, serum creatinine, glucose, base excess, pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and body temperature. Notably, a cluster with ‘moderate’ TBI (by traditional classification) and deranged metabolic profile, had a worse outcome than a cluster with ‘severe’ GCS and a normal metabolic profile. Addition of cluster labels significantly improved the prognostic precision of the IMPACT (International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical trials in TBI) extended model, for prediction of both unfavourable outcome and mortality (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Six stable and clinically distinct TBI endotypes were identified by probabilistic unsupervised clustering. In addition to presenting neurology, a profile of biochemical derangement was found to be an important distinguishing feature that was both biologically plausible and associated with outcome. Our work motivates refining current TBI classifications with factors describing metabolic stress. Such data-driven clusters suggest TBI endotypes that merit investigation to identify bespoke treatment strategies to improve care. Trial registration The core study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02210221, registered on August 06, 2014, with Resource Identification Portal (RRID: SCR_015582).
AB - Background: While the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is one of the strongest outcome predictors, the current classification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as ‘mild’, ‘moderate’ or ‘severe’ based on this fails to capture enormous heterogeneity in pathophysiology and treatment response. We hypothesized that data-driven characterization of TBI could identify distinct endotypes and give mechanistic insights. Methods: We developed an unsupervised statistical clustering model based on a mixture of probabilistic graphs for presentation (< 24 h) demographic, clinical, physiological, laboratory and imaging data to identify subgroups of TBI patients admitted to the intensive care unit in the CENTER-TBI dataset (N = 1,728). A cluster similarity index was used for robust determination of optimal cluster number. Mutual information was used to quantify feature importance and for cluster interpretation. Results: Six stable endotypes were identified with distinct GCS and composite systemic metabolic stress profiles, distinguished by GCS, blood lactate, oxygen saturation, serum creatinine, glucose, base excess, pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and body temperature. Notably, a cluster with ‘moderate’ TBI (by traditional classification) and deranged metabolic profile, had a worse outcome than a cluster with ‘severe’ GCS and a normal metabolic profile. Addition of cluster labels significantly improved the prognostic precision of the IMPACT (International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical trials in TBI) extended model, for prediction of both unfavourable outcome and mortality (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Six stable and clinically distinct TBI endotypes were identified by probabilistic unsupervised clustering. In addition to presenting neurology, a profile of biochemical derangement was found to be an important distinguishing feature that was both biologically plausible and associated with outcome. Our work motivates refining current TBI classifications with factors describing metabolic stress. Such data-driven clusters suggest TBI endotypes that merit investigation to identify bespoke treatment strategies to improve care. Trial registration The core study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02210221, registered on August 06, 2014, with Resource Identification Portal (RRID: SCR_015582).
KW - Critical care
KW - Endotypes
KW - Intensive care unit
KW - Machine learning
KW - Traumatic brain injury
KW - Unsupervised clustering
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135370588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13054-022-04079-w
DO - 10.1186/s13054-022-04079-w
M3 - Article
SN - 1364-8535
VL - 26
JO - Critical Care
JF - Critical Care
IS - 1
M1 - 228
ER -