Co-channel interference in body area networks with indoor measurements at 2.4 GHz: Distance-to-interferer is a poor estimate of received interference power

L. W. Hanlen, D. Miniutti, D. Smith, D. Rodda, B. Gilbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inter-network interference is likely to be a significant source of difficulty for wireless body area networks. Movement, proximity of networks, the large number of nodes per network and the lack of central coordination make cellular approaches to interference modeling ineffective. We examine the interference power of multiple Body Area Networks (BANs) when people move randomly within an indoor office environment. The power-loss trend over 3 m is overwhelmed by random variations in the signal power. Distance-to-interferer is a poor estimate of instantaneous received interference power, and an even less reliable estimate of instantaneous signal-to-interference ratio (SIR). We develop a lognormal statistical model for the signal-to-interference which incorporates the distance effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-125
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Wireless Information Networks
Volume17
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Co-channel interference in body area networks with indoor measurements at 2.4 GHz: Distance-to-interferer is a poor estimate of received interference power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this