Coalitions for a common purpose: Managing relationships in experiments

Heather Strang*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives: To discuss the character of relationships between operational and research staff and the necessary conditions for successful experiments. Methods: A review of research and experience in the conduct of experiments, especially randomized controlled trials, examining the foundations for success, issues in maintaining cooperation with operational staff, implementation and leadership issues. Results: The fundamental issue in successful experiments is the relationship between the operational and research entities, which most often resemble a coalition of temporary common interests rather than a partnership between parties with long-term common goals. Conclusion: Experiments require close cooperation between the parties because of the need for maintenance and monitoring. Researchers who use field trials have solved many of the common problems faced by those embarking on experiments and those who do so will be rewarded by the quality of their findings. Relationships which may be characterised as temporary coalitions for a common purpose may, under the right conditions, ultimately mature into true research partnerships.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)211-225
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Experimental Criminology
    Volume8
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Coalitions for a common purpose: Managing relationships in experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this