Collectives' duties and collectivization duties

Stephanie Collins*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    83 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Plausibly, only moral agents can bear action-demanding duties. This places constraints on which groups can bear action-demanding duties: only groups with sufficient structure-call them collectives-have the necessary agency. Moreover, if duties imply ability then moral agents (of both the individual and collectives varieties) can bear duties only over actions they are able to perform. It is thus doubtful that individual agents can bear duties to perform actions that only a collective could perform. This appears to leave us at a loss when assigning duties in circumstances where only a collective could perform some morally desirable action and no collective exists. But, I argue, we are not at a loss. This article outlines a new way of assigning duties over collective acts when there is no collective. Specifically, we should assign collectivization duties to individuals. These are individual duties to take steps towards forming a collective, which then incurs a duty over the action. I give criteria for when individuals have collectivization duties and discuss the demands these duties place on their bearers.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)231-248
    Number of pages18
    JournalAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
    Volume91
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Collectives' duties and collectivization duties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this